Home » 2016 » driving » hatback » interior » new » performance » report » test drive » verdict » volvo » XC60 » 2016 VOLVO XC60 | Volvo XC60 test drive performance review

2016 VOLVO XC60 | Volvo XC60 test drive performance review

2016 VOLVO XC60 | Volvo XC60 test drive performance review - The 2016 Volvo XC60 is basically unchanged except for the removal of the the quality digital compass on trims that come standard with navigation.

The 2016 Volvo XC60 may be a two-row luxury crossover available in front- or all-wheel-drive configurations.

Volvo XC60 test drive performance review

2016 Volvo XC60 test drive performance review

Four engines are available within the 2016 Volvo XC60 and they’re paired to either an eight- or six-speed automatic transmission system

Model: XC60 T5 Drive-E

Engine and Transmission: Turbocharged 2.0-liter I-4 – eight-speed automatic
Power: 240 hp/258 lb-ft of torque
EPA-Rated Fuel Economy: 23/31 mpg city/highway
Towing Capacity: 3,500 pounds

Model: XC60 T5 AWD

Engine and Transmission: Turbocharged two.5-liter I-5 – six-speed automatic
Power: 250 hp/266 lb-ft
EPA-Rated Fuel Economy: 19/26 mpg
Towing Capacity: three,500 pounds

Model: XC60 T6 Drive-E

Engine and Transmission: Super- and turbocharged 2.0-liter I-4 – eight-speed automatic
Power: 302 hp/295 lb-ft
EPA-Rated Fuel Economy: 22/29 mpg
Towing Capacity: 3,500 pounds

Model: XC60 T6 AWD and XC60 T6 AWD R-Design

Engine and Transmission: Turbocharged 3.0-liter I-6 – six-speed automatic
Power: 300 hp/325 lb-ft (XC60 T6 AWD), 325 hp/354 lb-ft (XC60 T6 AWD R-Design)
EPA-Rated Fuel Economy: 17/23 mpg
Towing Capacity: 3,500 pounds

Cargo capacity within the 2016 XC60 is generous despite its sexy exterior, with up to 30.8 cubic feet behind the second row and 67.4 boxy with the 40/20/40 split-folding rear seats folded. passenger area for four adults is generous, making the XC60 a good alternative as a family vehicle and for transportation large items.

In a comparison test that additionally included the Lexus NX 200t, BMW X3, Lincoln MKC, and Land Rover range Rover Evoque, the front-drive Volvo XC60 T6 placed last as a results of its stiff ride, and heavy, torque-steer-prone steering. However, when it comes to area, the XC60 proved to be one of the roomiest, providing extra space than its competitors. we have a tendency to found the infotainment system fussy to use and also the screen to be on the tiny facet.

Although it’s not as athletic because the Lexus NX 200t or the BMW X3, the XC60 handles decent, while acceleration from the T6 variants are strong. in a 2015 first test review, we have a tendency to said that the XC60 T6 fares well against the category-leading Lexus RX 350. However, we have a tendency to also noted that the turbo-six-equipped XC60s perform even better than its front-drive counterparts due to their standard all-wheel drive systems end